Skip to content
SCHUHEN Consulting SCHUHEN Consulting
Specialist Advisory

Contract and Performance Monitoring

A thorough check of what is actually delivered on site – documented with SCVeridit, our own inspection tool, and usable in the next contract review meeting.

What was agreed and what is delivered

Ask a client and their service provider separately about the quality at the same site. You get two answers, both honestly meant and far apart. One remembers the complaints, the other the night shifts.

Between the service specification and what actually happens at the site there is almost always more than either side realises. Not out of ill will: areas shift, staff change, cleaning frequencies are quietly adjusted because daily operation leaves no alternative. It usually only becomes noticeable when the extension is due.

At that point the basis for a factual conversation is missing. Two impressions stand against each other, and neither can be evidenced. A documented check creates that basis – for both sides.

Three sources of insight in performance monitoring The check on site, the review of contractual records and the view of those involved combine into a maturity rating. WHAT THE RESULT IS MADE OF Inspection on site Sampling in the building, during service hours Review of contract records Structured question set per inspection area Views of those involved Client, contractor, users Maturity level An impression is not a finding

Why monitoring is more than a site inspection

01

The spot check is decided on site

Which rooms are checked we decide at the site, not in preparation. Anyone who fixes that in advance is checking with notice – and is measuring the exception, not daily practice.

02

Three perspectives instead of one

What is visible on site, what the contract requires and how those involved experience it are three different things. We record all three and bring them together into one result.

03

Traceable years later

Every finding is recorded in a structured form and assigned to the relevant part of the contract. The completed report is protected against subsequent changes and stays readable in the version in which it was produced.

What we check on site

You commission either a one-off survey or recurring monitoring at an agreed interval. Both are possible for cleaning and for security services, and both work on either side of the contract: clients have what they receive checked, service providers have what they deliver checked.

01

Cleaning quality control on site

Spot checks of cleaning quality against defined assessment criteria, by room and by type of service. Complaints are described and documented photographically.

02

Audit of the security service

A comparison of the security service owed with the one delivered: staffing levels, patrols, duty instructions, reporting, and the qualification and instruction of the personnel deployed.

03

Review of contractual records

A structured question set across six areas of examination: contract fulfilment and scope of services, staff and qualifications, cleaning equipment and materials, communication and documentation, subcontractors, and hygiene and occupational safety.

04

Survey of those involved

Clients, service providers and, on request, the users receive an access link without a login. Their view feeds into the result and is shown in the report for what it is: a perception, not a measurement.

05

Assessment and measures

Placing the findings in context: what is an isolated case, what is a pattern? Every finding leads directly to a measure, with a responsible person and a deadline.

06

Recurring monitoring and development

From the second check onwards it becomes visible whether anything has moved. That is precisely the value of regular monitoring: it shows not just the condition, but the direction.

07

When findings lead to consequences

An inspection report on its own changes nothing. On request we support the conversation with the service provider, help adjust the service specification, or prepare what is needed for a re-tender. In every case the documentation is already there, and the discussion does not have to start with the question of what was found at all.

Frequently asked questions

The questions we are asked most often

How does a check on site work?

We first review the contract, the service specification and any records available. We then check at the site during the actual service times – for cleaning often early in the morning or in the evening, for security services at night as well. Which rooms go into the spot check is decided only once we are there. The findings are recorded immediately and assigned to the relevant part of the contract.

What is SCVeridit?

SCVeridit is our own inspection tool for structured performance monitoring. It maps the parts of the contract, guides the person carrying out the check and produces an ordered report from it. It also works without a network connection, which in basements and stairwells regularly makes the difference. The benefit lies in traceability: every finding is documented, every assessment reasoned – months later as well.

How often should monitoring take place?

That depends on the contract volume and on the experience so far. With a new contract, a check after the start-up phase is advisable, then once or twice a year. If there are already irregularities, more closely spaced, until the picture stabilises. The real benefit comes from the second check onwards, because a development can then be read off.

Can service providers commission a check as well?

Yes, and that happens regularly. Anyone who has their own performance checked before the client does knows the weak points first. It is at the same time the most robust form of quality evidence: documented, gathered from outside and not produced in-house. As in every project, we act for one side only.

What happens to the report?

You receive it as a document that can be used directly in the contract review meeting: with the finding, its assignment and an assessment for each item. On request we also make it available to the service provider – in many cases that is the quickest route to a solution, because both sides are then talking from the same basis.

Further reading

Articles on this topic from our blog.

Contract and performance monitoring ·

The Contractor's Own Inspections: When They Check Themselves

A contractor’s own inspections are necessary and no use as evidence. Four places where they systematically flatter the picture, the structural limit behind that, and why the divergence from the client’s inspection is the finding that matters.

You want to know what is actually being delivered.

In an initial consultation we clarify the scope: which sites, which services, which interval. Free of charge and without obligation.

Request consultation
© 2026 SCHUHEN Consulting GmbH. All rights reserved.